1. President Trump’s hasty withdrawal from Syria will result in genocide of the Kurds.
2. Trump’s heroic deal with Erdogan will save a generation of Kurds from slaughter.
3. The withdrawal of US troops from Syria will cost more (lives and money) than it saves.
4. Our withdrawal from Syria is now complete, but at what cost?
5. After Syria, can the US be trusted as a military ally?
6. Trump’s withdrawal from Syria was his only unimpeachable act of last week.
7. Trump says the Kurds are delighted by the deal with Syria. Is he right?
In class Task:
As a Reply below, write one or more strong Thesis Statements on the topic of Facial Recognition Software.
ahntkd99
carahall
andrewbecharaa
athenapup4
bane1900
bestbaker123
bmdpiano
comp0327
compclass8
cynicalwordsmith22
doglover441
drippydoughnut
drpaleontology
gcatt310
givemeclouttokens
hershey515
iamsleepy01
imagination4421
influenza123
jackso23
Jayv23
kraemercali
lazybear8
lelebxby
lg102015
lovericeandnoodles
lucbe219
morra2024
mpsj13
roses0102
Sub2MigzFilms
smellycat23
tenere84
thefrontbottom
voxpopuli75
whosyourcookie22
yankeefan25
Newspaperlessness 
Facial recognition software has the potential to be abused by our governments.
Facial recognition software invades the privacy of citizens.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software is revolutionizing how people live their lives.
Facial recognition software is helping police convict people that have committed crimes.
LikeLike
1. Implementation of facial recognition software into our everyday lives will cause tremendous growth in our way of living.
2. Facial recognition software obstructs the flow of everyday life and the privacy that comes with it.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software is an amazing use of technology.
Facial Recognition Software has indicted many people of crimes.
Neither of these qualifies as a good Thesis Statement because readers cannot tell from your claim whether you approve or disapprove of FRS. You might very well regard it as “amazing” but advocate that it not be used at all or not be used in specific circumstances. Your second claim is just as ambiguous. FRS is indeed used to indict people of crimes, but does it get the criminal, or does it falsely indict innocent citizens because of inefficiencies in the program? You don’t say.
Possible alternatives to your sentences would include:
1. FRS is an exciting and indispensable tool for law enforcement to bring criminals to justice.
2. The better FRS becomes at distinguishing individuals, the safer it becomes as a tool for law enforcement.
3. Like lie detector tests, FRS isn’t good enough yet to convict on the basis of facial IDs alone, but they provide excellent corroborating evidence.
LikeLike
Facial recognition is making life easier for people.
Many people feel that facial recognition violates our rights.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition software is a malicious and invasive form of government intervention in the everyday citizen’s life.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software has the potential to be abused by our governments.
Facial recognition software will eliminate our anonymity in public places.
LikeLike
1. Facial recognition software is violating law abiding citizens desired rights to privacy.
2. Facial recognition software results in false matches which negatively interferes with the lives of law abiding citizens.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software is invasive and a violation of constitutional rights
Law Abiding Citizens should have no worries when using Facial Recognition Software.
Facial Recognition Software can be inaccurate and results in wrongful convictions
LikeLike
-Facial Recognition Software is inaccurate and causes wrongful convictions.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software invades the privacy of citizens.
Facial recognition is a great asset to the government.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software is an invasion to the privacy of citizens.
Facial recognition software creates no problems for law abiding citizens.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software is intrusive to citizen’s privacy.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software violates citizens rights to freedom
LikeLike
1. Implementation of FRS in national security systems will endanger our right to privacy.
2. Though it is believed that, if one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to fear, FRS is something that everyone should fear.
3. FRS is often inaccurate and can lead to wrongful incrimination of innocent people.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition is invasive to our privacy.
LikeLike
The first thesis statement is strong, arguable, and clear, but it could be better in its claims
The second thesis statement is stronger than the first because it makes multiple strong claims in the thesis.
The third thesis statement is fine but its not as strong as it could be
The fourth thesis statement is probably not a thesis statement
The fifth thesis statement is not a thesis
The sixth thesis statement is a pretty good thesis statement because it makes a strong claim
The seventh thesis statement is not a thesis statement because it makes no claim.
Thesis on facial recognition:
Facial recognition inappropriately invades our privacy and thieves all of our information for the greedy corporate hands.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software is invasive to a citizen’s fourth amendment which is the right to privacy.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software violates our constitutional rights
LikeLike
1) The development of facial recognition software keeps us safe by helping police put criminals behind bars.
2) Facial recognition software allows the government access to our individual privacy.
LikeLike
– Facial Recognition Software is often inaccurate in identifying an individual.
– The Facial Recognition Software has no flaws.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software in its current state, should not be used in the conviction of criminals.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software violates our rights to public anonymity.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software will lead to governments becoming mass surveillance states.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software must be put on hold and then regulated before being released back to the public.
LikeLike
1. Facial recognition software threatens the rights of law-abiding Americans by mis-identifying criminals.
LikeLike
Hair and makeup should be used to protect the faces of the innocent from facial recognition software.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software is a violation of a citizen’s right to privacy.
LikeLike
Facial recognition software is a violation of peoples’ privacy.
LikeLike
Many of us seem attentive of surveillance systems designed to automatically identify or profile us in public, but what is most concerning is that it doesn’t seem to matter much.
The basic technologies, like facial recognition software, are being developed today and there are no rules limiting their use.
There are a few potential benefits to using facial recognition software to prevent and solve crimes, but there are many concerns about the privacy, safety and legislation concerning the use of this technology.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FRS is an amazing piece of technology.
FRS has indicted many people of crimes.
LikeLike
Facial Recognition Software is an amazing use of technology.
Facial Recognition Software has indicted many people of crimes.
LikeLike