Agenda THU NOV 13

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

TR Workshop

Negative Sports Media

Professional sports are known as great entertainment, but some people only find and report the negative news that they hear or see. News reporters, for example the reporters of newspapers and news shows, don’t always write about what happens on the field, but rather find aspects of what professional players do wrong off of the field.

The first sentence sets up a false contradiction. There’s nothing contradictory about:
A: Sports are great entertainment
B: Reporters go negative
As a consequence, readers don’t know what to make of the very first sentence, and the author loses most of her credibility.

A truer contradiction would be:
A: Sports are thrilling for the physical feats on display in athletic competition.
B: However, many reporters ignore the spectacle on the field and concentrate only on reporting negative off-the-field activities.

This is exactly the content of the second sentence, a clear demonstration that the first sentence was wasteful and confusing.

Exercise: Rewrite the first paragraph in a Reply below, in one sentence or two. Identify your comment as “Negative Sports Media.”

Learning in Our Sleep

Sleep is the most effective tool a person can utilize when wanting to improve the performance and efficiency of their brain. The more sleep someone gets the better their performance on exams and anything they are trying to learn will be.

The sentences Fail For Grammar (FFG) twice for pronoun disagreement (a person/their brain) (someone/their performance/they). But besides that they’re also quite wordy and get the essay off to a very slow start.

It says: Sleep is the most effective tool a person can utilize when wanting to improve the performance and efficiency of their brain.
It means: Sleep improves the brain’s efficiency.

It says: The more sleep someone gets the better their performance on exams and anything they are trying to learn will be.
It means: Sleeping longer helps us learn and perform better on exams.

Exercise: Rewrite the first paragraph in a Reply below, in just a few sentences. Consider using a brief, simple illustration. The tone is informational but light.

Failing Schools

The replacement of large failing public schools with smaller “specialized” schools will successfully guide underprivileged students in the right direction to become successful. Many disadvantaged students in areas like New York City are forced to attend large high schools with extremely low graduation rates. These high schools are overcrowded with students and understaffed with teachers. Classrooms are filled above capacity and the “schools are simply under managed.” These inner city areas consist of countless students living in poverty and receiving an education without the proper motivation and techniques needed to succeed.

The sentences introduce plenty of material but are wordy and repetitious.

Fat: The replacement of large failing public schools with smaller “specialized” schools will successfully guide underprivileged students in the right direction to become successful
Lean: Underprivileged students are more likely to succeed when large failing public schools are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat: Many disadvantaged students in areas like New York City are forced to attend large high schools with extremely low graduation rates.
Lean (combine with 1st sentence): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when large failing public schools are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat:These high schools are overcrowded with students and understaffed with teachers.
Lean: (Combine 1st 3 sentences): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat: Classrooms are filled above capacity and the “schools are simply under managed.”
Lean (combine with 1, 2, 3): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed, badly managed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools, says Bill Moyers.

Fat: These inner city areas consist of countless students living in poverty and receiving an education without the proper motivation and techniques needed to succeed.
Lean: Inner-city students already living in poverty deserve better than failing schools that don’t motivate them or teach them to succeed.

Final Product:Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed, badly managed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools, says Bill Moyers. Inner-city students already living in poverty deserve better than failing schools that don’t motivate them or teach them to succeed.

Exercise: Expand the final two-sentence version back out to three or four sentences, adding a hook, a brief illustration, or an expression of opinion.

Death with Dignity

Paul Lamb, 57 was left quadriplegic in a horrific car accident twenty- three years ago. He lives day by day in pain. His only release is the constant drip of morphine into his body. Mr. Lamb is not the man that he wanted to be, having to be dependent on the help from others. He describes his life as “unbearable” because of the intense pain. He has gone to court multiple times in hopes someone will be merciful and allow him to end his suffering, but he got rejected.

The paragraph suffers from a choppy, repetitive sentence structure. Every sentence begins with Paul Lamb or a pronoun referring to Paul Lamb. The result is a series of unrelated statements that make no argument.

One Solution: Paul Lamb, 57, deserves the right to be released from his pain and dependency. For 23 years, he has lived in unbearable pain, or debilitated by a morphine drip that eases the body’s agony without relieving his total dependence on others since quadriplegia deprived him of the use of his limbs. Since he cannot be the man he wants to be, Lamb has spent years unsuccessfully battling the courts for the right to end his suffering.

Exercise: Rewrite the same material to emphasize why Mr. Lamb, and nobody else, should have the right to decide his fate.

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | 17 Comments

By verbing, it needs a subject.

By verbing,

Be very worried if your sentence begins with “By any verb ending in -ing.” The odds are about 50/50 you’ll fall into a syntax trap.

The winner:

By justifying the actions of the FBI, Director Comey hopes to assure Americans that their constitutional rights are being respected.

  1. The opening phrase names an action taken by someone.
  2. The person who acted immediately follows.

By naming the actor immediately after the action, the author wrote a good sentence.

The loser:

By diminishing our personal privacy, it is only a matter of time until we fall victim to constitutional abuses on every scale.

This sentence fails to identify how our privacy is diminished, or by whom. The only apparent subject for the action is “it.” And we have no idea who or what “it” is.

Revise the sentence in a Reply below either by providing an actor for the action, or by eliminating the dangerous “By phrase” altogether.

 

 

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | 39 Comments

Agenda WED NOV 12

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

MW Workshop

Negative Sports Media

Professional sports are known as great entertainment, but some people only find and report the negative news that they hear or see. News reporters, for example the reporters of newspapers and news shows, don’t always write about what happens on the field, but rather find aspects of what professional players do wrong off of the field.

The first sentence sets up a false contradiction. There’s nothing contradictory about:
A: Sports are great entertainment
B: Reporters go negative
As a consequence, readers don’t know what to make of the very first sentence, and the author loses most of her credibility.

A truer contradiction would be:
A: Sports are thrilling for the physical feats on display in athletic competition.
B: However, many reporters ignore the spectacle on the field and concentrate only on reporting negative off-the-field activities.

This is exactly the content of the second sentence, a clear demonstration that the first sentence was wasteful and confusing.

Exercise: Rewrite the first paragraph in a Reply below, in one sentence or two. Identify your comment as “Negative Sports Media.”

Learning in Our Sleep

Sleep is the most effective tool a person can utilize when wanting to improve the performance and efficiency of their brain. The more sleep someone gets the better their performance on exams and anything they are trying to learn will be.

The sentences Fail For Grammar (FFG) twice for pronoun disagreement (a person/their brain) (someone/their performance/they). But besides that they’re also quite wordy and get the essay off to a very slow start.

It says: Sleep is the most effective tool a person can utilize when wanting to improve the performance and efficiency of their brain.
It means: Sleep improves the brain’s efficiency.

It says: The more sleep someone gets the better their performance on exams and anything they are trying to learn will be.
It means: Sleeping longer helps us learn and perform better on exams.

Exercise: Rewrite the first paragraph in a Reply below, in just a few sentences. Consider using a brief, simple illustration. The tone is informational but light.

Failing Schools

The replacement of large failing public schools with smaller “specialized” schools will successfully guide underprivileged students in the right direction to become successful. Many disadvantaged students in areas like New York City are forced to attend large high schools with extremely low graduation rates. These high schools are overcrowded with students and understaffed with teachers. Classrooms are filled above capacity and the “schools are simply under managed.” These inner city areas consist of countless students living in poverty and receiving an education without the proper motivation and techniques needed to succeed.

The sentences introduce plenty of material but are wordy and repetitious.

Fat: The replacement of large failing public schools with smaller “specialized” schools will successfully guide underprivileged students in the right direction to become successful
Lean: Underprivileged students are more likely to succeed when large failing public schools are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat: Many disadvantaged students in areas like New York City are forced to attend large high schools with extremely low graduation rates.
Lean (combine with 1st sentence): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when large failing public schools are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat:These high schools are overcrowded with students and understaffed with teachers.
Lean: (Combine 1st 3 sentences): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools.

Fat: Classrooms are filled above capacity and the “schools are simply under managed.”
Lean (combine with 1, 2, 3): Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed, badly managed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools, says Bill Moyers.

Fat: These inner city areas consist of countless students living in poverty and receiving an education without the proper motivation and techniques needed to succeed.
Lean: Inner-city students already living in poverty deserve better than failing schools that don’t motivate them or teach them to succeed.

Final Product:Underprivileged students in New York City are more likely to graduate when the overcrowded, understaffed, badly managed public schools they’re forced to attend are replaced with smaller “specialized” schools, says Bill Moyers. Inner-city students already living in poverty deserve better than failing schools that don’t motivate them or teach them to succeed.

Exercise: Expand the final two-sentence version back out to three or four sentences, adding a hook, a brief illustration, or an expression of opinion.

Death with Dignity

Paul Lamb, 57 was left quadriplegic in a horrific car accident twenty- three years ago. He lives day by day in pain. His only release is the constant drip of morphine into his body. Mr. Lamb is not the man that he wanted to be, having to be dependent on the help from others. He describes his life as “unbearable” because of the intense pain. He has gone to court multiple times in hopes someone will be merciful and allow him to end his suffering, but he got rejected.

The paragraph suffers from a choppy, repetitive sentence structure. Every sentence begins with Paul Lamb or a pronoun referring to Paul Lamb. The result is a series of unrelated statements that make no argument.

One Solution: Paul Lamb, 57, deserves the right to be released from his pain and dependency. For 23 years, he has lived in unbearable pain, or debilitated by a morphine drip that eases the body’s agony without relieving his total dependence on others since quadriplegia deprived him of the use of his limbs. Since he cannot be the man he wants to be, Lamb has spent years unsuccessfully battling the courts for the right to end his suffering.

Exercise: Rewrite the same material to emphasize why Mr. Lamb, and nobody else, should have the right to decide his fate.

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | 21 Comments

Agenda TUE NOV 11

  • Course Outline Update
  • Class Notes
    • Don’t forget to launch your Notes for today’s live critiques of the Throwdown posts-in-progress.
  • The Throwdown Model
  • Live Critiques.
    • If you want your Throwdown post to be reviewed live in class today, drop the comment “Live critique please” on your post.
Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

A07-Throwdown

Website Title: The New York Times
Article Title: The Last Right: Why America is Moving Slowly on Assisted Suicide
Publisher: The New York Times
Electronically Published: October 11, 2014
Date Accessed: November 06, 2014
Author: Ross Douthat

Douthat, Ross. “The Last Right: Why America Is Moving Slowly on Assisted Suicide.” The New York Times. N.p., 11 Oct. 2014. Web. 06 Nov. 2014.

Ross Douthat is a conservative New York Times columnist, as well as an author and a blogger. He wrote “Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics,” published in 2012, and he co-wrote with Reihan Salam the article “Grand New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream,” published in 2008. He was once the senior editor of The Atlantic and began writing for the Times in 2009 and writes mostly about politics, religion, higher education and moral values.

The New York Times is an American newspaper that was founded in 1851 and has one more Pulitzer Prizes than any other news organizations. The printed version of The New York times is the largest metropolitan newspaper in the United States and is ranked 39th in the world based solely on circulation. Though the paper claims that it is completely unbiased it does have many liberal and democratic undertones in a variety of articles.

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to point out that assisted suicide is a choice that shouldn’t be confined to only a handful of states. The author, Ross Douthat, begins to try and sway his audience by opening his case with the heartbreaking story of Brittney Maynard. Maynard was a 29 year old woman who was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer, and wouldn’t have much time to live. He tells the readers that she decided to take her life in her own hands because she feared the side effects of the terminal cancer. Her and her family had to uproot their lives to move from California to Oregon, one of the few states that allows assisted suicide. He then proceeds to discredit those who oppose the legalization of assisted suicide by saying that those who oppose it are trying to prove that life is always worth living, until your natural last breath. But when the time comes and they are asked what a woman like Maynard has to live for while battling the a terminal disease they have no legitimate answers. Douthat tells his audience that allowing death with dignity is the only real humane thing to do.

Audience: The audience of this article is those who have taken stands on assisted suicide, whether they are for it, against it or even on the fence. It’s meant to sway people to agree with death with dignity.

Summary: Brittney Maynard was a 29 year old woman who was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer, she was going to die. There was no avoiding it. Her and her family uprooted their lives so she could take her life into her own hands and die on her terms. By doing this she avoided going through the all the pain of terminal brain cancer, and the side effects such as the personality changes, mood swings, loss of basic physical functions, and deteriorating mental state. There she will meet her inevitable death on November 1, 2014, but it will be on her terms and she will not be suffering. Maynard was going to die, no matter what treatment she received  matter and even if she did receive treatment it would just have been prolonging her suffering.

Death with dignity legalization shouldn’t be moving this slowly, but for some reason people are still opposing it, even though it’s a better choice than suffering. Even those opposed to death with dignity are often at a loss for words when asked what someone whose last few months are filled with nothing but pain and suffering and then death have to live for. Death with dignity helps avoid most of the pain and suffering with the same awful outcome, and that’s what should matter. That the person who was dying, died as they chose to and didn’t go through any unnecessary pain.

Website Title: CNN
Article Title: When Assisted Suicide is not the Answer
Publisher: CNN
Electronically Published: October 8, 2014
Date Accessed: November 09, 2014
Author: Sandeep Jauhar

Jauhar, Sandeep. “When Assisted Suicide Is Not the Answer.” CNN. N.p., 8 Oct. 2014. Web. 9 Nov. 2014.

Sandeep Jauhar has a Ph.D. in physics from Berkeley college. He then studied at a New York teaching hospital, and it was there that Jauhar struggled with his decision to go into medicine when a girlfriend’s incurable illness made him want a profession that could help him impact people’s lives directly. Today he is a cardiologist and the director of the Heart Failure Program at Long Island Jewish Medical Center. He also writes regularly for The New York Times.

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to show that a person can support assisted suicide, but also believe that it shouldn’t be used frequently or for all cases. The author of this article, Sandeep Jauhar, tells us of an 84 year old woman that was once his patient who was suffering with the end stages of heart failure and begged him to help her die. Jauhar goes on to tell his readers that he went to the ethics committee pleading her case, but they said no, and that he should just put his patient on a morphine drip though she wasn’t in pain. He tells readers how he does believe that while assisted suicide is an answer, it’s not always the right one. He thinks that in most cases hospice is a better solution than assisted suicide, and as a doctor he states that he would like to see assisted suicide being legal but used sparingly. He explains that sometimes it is the best option for a patient who is suffering from a terribly fatal disease to turn to assisted suicide and though everyone may not agree with it, sometimes it’s all that can be done.

Audience: The audience of this article is for people who do not support the right of assisted suicide. It is meant to show that it’s not necessary to fully support the idea of it, it just needs to be accepted that sometimes it’s the best or only option.

Summary: When the story of Brittney Maynard, a 29 year old diagnosed with terminal brain cancer whose life was ended with the help of assisted suicide, went viral, memories of an 84 year old patient suffering from the end stages of heart failure surfaced. She begged for me to help her die, because she couldn’t deal with living a life that wasn’t really living. She said that she was only half there and that she just didn’t want to go on like that anymore. So I brought it to the ethics committee and her pleaded her case, but it was turned down. I was told to just put her on a morphine drip even though she wasn’t currently in pain. And while I eventually did put her on a morphine drip, I acknowledged the fact that assisted suicide in her case, may have been the best option for her. In most cases hospice is a better solution, and it can be used to make terminally ill patients comfortable and live a decent life before the face the inevitable. But sometimes there’s just nothing anyone can do and while assisted suicide should be legal in all states it should only be used for extreme cases.

Website Title: Life News
Article Title: Brittany Maynard’s Assisted Suicide Corrupts Medicine: Killing Isn’t Medical Treatment
Publisher: Life News
Electronically Published: November 7, 2014
Date Accessed: November 09, 2014
Author: Wesley J. Smith

Smith, Wesley J. “Brittany Maynard’s Assisted Suicide Corrupts Medicine: Killing Isn’t Medical Treatment.” Life News. N.p., 7 Nov. 2014. Web. 9 Nov. 2014.

Wesley J. Smith is a lawyer, an author, and a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. He works as a lawyer and consultant for the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.  As an author, he has published several works, the most recent of them being, “The War on Humans,” in 2014.

Life News is an independent news agency that is devoted to reporting news that affects the pro-life movement. Life News was founded in 1992 to bring pro-life news to pro-life communities. They are not affiliated with any organization, religious group, political party or church denomination. They are heavily influenced by religion and are extremely liberal.

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to completely destroy all beliefs that legalizing assisted suicide would ever be a good idea. Wesley J. Smith, the author of the article starts by saying that it would corrupt medicine, and that it would be a disgrace to the medical field if it was legalized throughout the country. He says that being a medical professional includes helping people, healing them, not helping them in their death. Smith says that killing is against the oath of medical workers and killing isn’t a medical treatment.

Audience: The intended audience is for people who support the right of assisted suicide, and those who supported Brittany Maynard’s decision. The author wants everyone to realize that assisted suicide isn’t and should never be a part of the medical field.

Summary: Death with dignity being legalized would be a complete disgrace to the medical field everywhere. It would corrupt the practice of medicine because killing is not a medical treatment. Assisted suicide completely throws medical ethics out the window. It’s a doctors job to care for patients, help heal them, support them, not to help them take their life. Medical professionals should try and make their patients realize that they should fight to live, all the way until their natural last breath. Their lives should be lived to the fullest until their last day that is destined for them, not the day they choose.

My Take: The process of legalizing death with dignity laws should definitely be sped up because no one should be able to force another person to live. When death is inevitable, no matter what choices a person makes or treatments she receives, if she chooses to die on her terms, she should be allowed to. A person should never be forced to live a life that doesn’t consist of much living, because that is inhumane. People are humane enough to when it’s time to put the family dog down, but they don’t seem to see the issue with forcing a human being to live a life filled with constant pain and suffering. A person who chooses assisted suicide most likely wants to live, but knows that what the future has in store for them won’t have much of a meaning to it. When death is inevitable, it shouldn’t matter how the person dies. Dauthat’s article asks the question if a person doesn’t want to live, then what are they actually living for? And he gives us the answer, nothing at that point. A person who is terminally ill is being cut short. The quality of life she is going to be living, isn’t really living. She’ll be hooked up to machines, or bed ridden and in pain. Living like that, just prolongs her suffering and the suffering of her loved ones. They are sitting there, completely helpless as they watch the person they once knew, seize to exist as the terminal disease takes them over. And while I agree that death with dignity should be legal in all states, I don’t think it should be limited to just those with terminal diseases. I believe that assisted suicide should be able to help someone whose quality of life is not really a life anymore. For example, a person who is completely paralyzed, unable to do anything that he once loved. He’s alive but he’s not living, he has moved on yet his body continues to live. He’s nothing but a shell, and he’s ready to die. There is no reason why he shouldn’t be able to die if he chooses to. Jauhar makes a good argument stating that assisted suicide should only be used when completely necessary, but who should have the power to make that decision? The only person who should be able to decide when they die is the person who is facing death. To grant one terminally ill person the right to die while forcing another to live is just unfair. I don’t think anyone should be able to make that decision other than the person suffering. People who argue that death with dignity will disgrace the medical profession are wrong. It’s a doctors’ job to help their patients as much as they possibly can, and if the only way to help them is for assisting them in a painless, peaceful death, I see nothing wrong in that.

Posted in 123 Uncheck this box! | 1 Comment

Critical Engagement Assignments A07, A08, A09

Your next three assignments (A07, A08, and A09) combine to make up the Critical Engagement Assignment (code-named The Throwdown).

  • A07: The Annotated Bibliography
    The first assignment of the Throwdown
    is an abbreviated version of an annotated bibliography.

    • You’ll list the usual bibliographic information: title, author, publication, date, web address, etc.
    • Author. You’ll also provide notes about the author’s relevant background, training, affiliations, previous publications, honors, awards, anything you think might affect the quality, reliability, or bias of the author’s work.
    • Publication. Finally, your bibliography will assess the reliability, credibility, popularity, academic authority, or reputation in its industry, for the purpose of assessing its relative value as a source for your assignment.
  • A08: Summaries and Purposes
    The second assignment of the Throwdown is a critical analysis of your sources. It contains three sections.

    • Purposes. For each of your three sources, you’ll analyze in your own voice what you believe to be the motivation for the author’s publication. Understandably, the author always intends to inform, but only rarely is an author simply reporting facts. You’ll analyze the choices the author makes about what to report, how she characterizes the people who play roles in the stories related, the language and tone she uses to communicate the narrative. Sometimes the author will overtly persuade readers; sometimes the message will be more covert; only rarely is there no discernible purpose behind a published work.
      • For example, an excerpt from a colleague’s work: The author’s clear purpose is to undermine the validity of the Republican successes in the recent election. While factually describing the recent Republican takeover of the Senate as a result of dissatisfaction with the economy and the president, the author negatively portrays the Republicans as aggressors. Throughout the article, Democrats are portrayed as “fighting off” Republican encroachment, and finally being “toppled.” The language consistently characterizes Republican challengers as aggressors or attackers rather than champions of their constituents. Democrats are portrayed as embattled defenders trying to hold back invading forces. Democrats not fully committed to their candidates are “disengaged from the process,” while Republicans are “conflicted about their choices.”
    • Audience. Put yourself in the author’s position. What readers does she hope to reach, and why? A good Audience section is an extension of the Purposes section. It explains how the author hopes to achieve the goal of persuading different groups. What does the Author want her readers to think, feel, or do?

      • For example, from a colleague’s work:1) Advocates for personal privacy rights and the free press looking for evidence that government agencies often violate both; 2) Readers on the fence trying to balance their support for strenuous law enforcement with their insistence that police need to be constrained from deceptive practices; 3) the FBI, the courts, and the law enforcement community, as an expression of outrage at their tactics.
    • Summary. You’ll summarize just those parts of the source that directly apply to your topic and theme. Use the author’s voice for this section. To the best of your ability, write your summary as if the author were writing it. Instead of reporting what the author said or meant, write as if you were yourself the author.
  • A09: My Take
    The third assignment (and the final section) of the Throwdown is the section where you add your voice to the conversation. Offer your own ideas on the key points or respond to what your authors have said (or both). The My Take section is the ultimate synthesis exercise, in which you blend your personal experience and background knowledge with the material you’ve learned during the research process, plus your attitudes about the other “experts” who have expressed themselves on the topic you’ve been studying.

MW Deadlines:

  • A07: Annotated Bibliography
    • 11:59PM SUN NOV 09
  • A08: Summaries and Purposes
    • 11:59PM TUE NOV 11
  • A09: My Take Section
    • 11:59PM SUN NOV 16

TR Deadlines:

  • A07: Annotated Bibliography
    • 11:59PM MON NOV 10
  • A08: Summaries and Purposes
    • 11:59PM WED NOV 12
  • A09: My Take Section
    • 11:59PM MON NOV 17

The Nitty Gritty

  • Post in the Critical Engagement category, and your username
  • Follow the Throwdown Model provided by your very devoted professor.
  • Give it the official title Throwdown—Username
  • Also give your Assignment a descriptive title.
    • For Example: Death with Dignity
  • Provide links to sources.
  • Provide a Works Cited.
  • Long Argument grade category (25%)
Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | 2 Comments

Agenda MON NOV 10

  • Course Outline Update
  • Class Notes
    • Don’t forget to launch your Notes for today’s live critiques of the Throwdown posts-in-progress.
  • The Throwdown Model
  • Live Critiques.
    • If you want your Throwdown post to be reviewed live in class today, drop the comment “Live critique please” on your post.
Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | Leave a comment

Blah; however, blah.

Conjunctive adverbs such as however, therefore, in addition, nevertheless, and furthermore, are used to transition between independent clauses and are punctuated with a semicolon and a comma, as demonstrated in the title above and the meme below.

Conjunctive Adverb Meme

Posted in davidbdale, Professor Post | 1 Comment